Thanks for trying out this experimental blog post assignment
with me. I wasn’t sure what you might find, but some of you had very insightful
things to say about the differences between Lethem’s concerns and those of his
sources. Of course, the purpose of this assignment was twofold: one, I wanted
you to begin to familiarize yourselves with library research tools, and two I
wanted you to continue to work on your close reading skills, particularly your
ability to make connections while simultaneously drawing distinctions. I hope
that, in addition to looking for the title of the source that Lethem used, you
spent a bit of time trying to figure out where you might locate that source. It sounds like some of you were able to find
books and articles online, but I’d also encourage you to find out where you can
go in the library to get physical copies of such things, since not everything
you’ll want to research will be available online. We’ll work on that more when
we hear a Rutgers research librarian’s guest lecture in October. Regarding
close reading, I think you all would benefit from even greater specificity when
you explain the significance of a quotation. Shreya does a good job providing a
detailed close reading in her post, which deals with an article about The Velveteen Rabbit as a metaphor for
the importance of circulating ideas. By working through different aspects of
the metaphor, she’s able to draw out the connections—and their limitations—more
clearly. One could also consider, for instance, the ways in which re-use deals
more with adding on new elements than stripping away elements of the original
idea, in contrast to what happens to the rabbit. Pointing out such distinctions
puts you into a better position when you’re trying to explain the significance of a connection. In your
blog posts and your papers, you should be answering the question “so what?” Why
does this point matter? For instance, is Lethem pointing out the absurdity of
treating ideas as property by drawing a comparison between ideas and physical
objects? What does it mean to “own” an idea? Is it even possible to be
original, according to Lethem?
No comments:
Post a Comment