Marc
Anthony Novillo
Exposition
& Argument
Erin
Kelly
November
15, 2016
Research
Paper Intro
“Imagination is the only weapon in
the war against reality” ~Jules de Gaultier.
The
power of the mind is one of the most beautiful, complex, interesting and
fascinating systems known to mankind, where it is indeed possible for the
fantastical to exist. The mind is an extremely powerful agent against the evils
of reality such that it is built with defense mechanisms that encourage the
formation of such outlandish yet comforting strands of a story. These stories
are put together by our minds in an attempt to escape the fears and anxieties
of the here and now. The brain can be rewired to perform these processes, so
much so that the senses can be enhanced when approached with physical trauma
such as blindness. “The Mind’s Eye,” by Oliver Sacks, details how the brain
physically rewires itself to compensate for blindness, exemplifying the
physiological and biological feats the brain can perform in order to operate at
full potential. Similarly, Robert Thurman’s “Wisdom” discusses the importance
of being open to the ever-changing environment and allowing for experience to
mold a person into a specific “self.” This molding is one of many rewiring
techniques of the brain, suggesting a certain plasticity evident in the minds
and brains of everyone, assuming the person has a healthy and normal brain.
Plasticity, rewiring, and molding all contribute to the manner in which humans
biologically cope dissociatively, as mentioned in “When I Woke Up Tuesday
Morning, It Was Friday,” by Martha Stout. The idea of a divided consciousness
is present in everyone who has experienced trauma at some point in their lives.
Divided consciousness, the separation of mind from reality, allows for a
temporary state of imagination where all is typically okay, and this serves as the
basis of an example of how humans cope with trauma and issues such as stress,
emotional damage, mental challenges, etc. The imagination is an escape route;
the mind presents an opportunity to step out of reality and enter a realm of
bliss and eternal possibilities. With that, the deep inner minds of people are
reflections of the true self, the true person a human is but will never be fully
understood as. The way a person thinks, feels, interacts, and emotes reflects
the imaginative and dissociative mind of the individual; a mind so affected by
the trauma and issues once experienced.
In a very linear sense, before a
complex interaction occurs between humans, a physical, biological, and chemical
factor must be played out. “The amygdala receives sensory information from the
five senses, via the thalamus, attaches emotional significance to the input,
and then passes along this emotional “evaluation” to the hippocampus. In
accordance with the amygdala’s “evaluation” of importance, the hippocampus is
activated to a greater or lesser degree, and functions to organize the new
input, and to integrate it with already existing information about similar
sensory events. Under a normal range of conditions, this system works
efficiently to consolidate memories according to their emotional priority”
(Stout, 421). What this means is that all information is tagged with an
emotional significance, a ticket saying “this is how I felt when this
happened.” Every event and action, stimulus and trigger presented after a
specific moment is tagged a certain way and the emotion experienced is now
fundamentally the associated trait of the action. Each and every time a similar
stimulus is presented, the associated emotion is recalled and retrieved. As a
prioritization tool, the brain will organize memories based on emotional
importance. Psychologically, the brain can “remember” events that never
actually happened in an effort to make a cohesive story out of the bits and
pieces that are missing from long term memory. In a physical sense, electrical
signals are sent just like normal recall, with chemical signals being induced
and emotional memories being formed. In a complex sense, the imagination will
form vivid representations of what should have or what one wanted to happen. This
occurs to make sense of old memories and cope with events that bring about many
strong emotions. Events that call forth strongly felt emotions will conduct an
interesting process in the mind. What one felt at the moment will affect the
perception of the actual situation, forming strands of made-up memories of
things that never actually happened, simply based on the fact that a certain
emotion was felt strongly at the time. For example, person A and person B may
get into a heated argument and person B may say, “Nothing will get resolved if
we don’t think rationally.” Nothing is particularly wrong with that statement,
but if person A interpreted those words as “You’re irrational and won’t let me
solve the issue,” then they may easily ‘remember’ person B calling them
irrational and using hurtful or offensive words. Even if it did not happen, it
is remembered that way, and this is a simple coping mechanism when it comes to threatening
or traumatic experiences (not necessarily petty arguments). When the situation
is in regards to something traumatic, for example a divorce, remembering the
situation as being completely against you is a coping mechanism that the brain
naturally activates. In other words, no matter whose “fault” it may have been,
it is a completely normal and acceptable process to first say, “It was their
fault, not mine!” That is simply a stage that is necessary to first calm the
many mixed emotions flowing through the mind and body. Of course, this is not
an excuse for prolonging of said stage!
Communicating issues to others serve
as a temporary buffer for emotional pain, but the most important player in the
game of self-healing is imagination. “…exposure to trauma may temporarily shut
down Broca’s area…the means by which we most often relate our experience to
others, and even to ourselves” (Stout 421). Not knowing how to relay emotions
calls for a mechanism to be practiced that is tailored to the individual, built
so in a way that makes an individual feel best because of its specific and
personal qualities. That mechanism is of course imagination. The way a person
will relate the experience to himself/herself will be through interests, a
certain comfortable medium that does not ignore the experience and its pain, but
does indeed make it interesting and slightly easier to cope with. For example,
a comic book fan might look at a terrible situation such a domestic violence as
a superhero. Acting like the hero themselves in their own head, they may
interpret the situation as a battle with a villain and that though they may be
down now, someday they will win the fight. This imaginary response does not
deny the fact that damage is present but it allows for a more positive outlook
of the future of the ordeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment